Causing Grievous Bodily Harm or Wounding with Intent

Understanding GBH and Wounding with Intent Laws
In New South Wales (NSW), the offence is governed by the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), particularly under Section 33(1)(a). This section makes it an offence to wound or cause grievous bodily harm to another person with the intention of causing GBH. The maximum penalty is 25 years imprisonment, reflecting the seriousness of the offence.
For a conviction, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused a wound or GBH and that they intended to cause that level of harm.
“Wounding” in NSW is legally defined as the breaking of both the outer and inner layers of skin, often through cutting or stabbing.
GBH is interpreted to include injuries such as:
- Permanent disfigurement, broken bones, or organ damage
Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH) refers to very serious physical injuries. Under Section 4 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), GBH includes:
- Any permanent or serious disfigurement
- The destruction (other than in childbirth) of a fetus
- Any grievous physical injury or impairment that causes lasting harm
It is more severe than "actual bodily harm" and typically requires hospitalisation or long term medical treatment.
Elements the Prosecution Must Prove
To secure a conviction for intentional GBH, the prosecution must prove:
- Intentional Harm – The accused deliberately inflicted the injury on the victim.
- Grievous Bodily Harm – The injury caused must be significant and meet the legal definition of GBH.
- Causation – The defendant’s actions directly led to the injury.
The prosecution must prove the defendant's actions were intentional, not accidental or reckless.
Possible Defences
Possible defences include:
- Self-Defence – If the accused was protecting themselves or others fromimminent harm.
- Duress – If the accused was forced to act due to threats of seriousharm.
- Necessity – If the actions were necessary to prevent greater harm.
- Lack of Intent – If the harm caused was not intentional orpremeditated.
A skilled lawyer will assess the facts and determine the best defence strategy.
Potential Penalties
The penalties for intentional GBH can vary, but may include:
- Conditional Release Order (CRO) – A good behaviour bond
- Community Correction Order (CCO) – Supervised order with conditions
- Intensive Correction Order (ICO) – Custodial sentence in the community
- Imprisonment – Up to 25 years
The severity of the penalty will depend on the circumstances of the offence.

Legal Process
& Options
If you are charged with intentional GBH, the legal process includes an investigation, court hearing, and potentially a trial. A not guilty plea leads to a defended hearing where evidence will be presented. If guilty, the court will proceed to sentencing. Having legal representation at every stage is essential.
Pleading
Not Guilty
If you believe the charges are unfounded or the evidence insufficient, pleading not guilty allows your lawyer to challenge the prosecution’s case by:
- Questioning the severity of the injury
- Arguing the actions were not intentional
- Presenting defences such as self-defence or duress
If the prosecution cannot prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, the charges may be dismissed.
Pleading
Guilty
Pleading guilty may lead to a more lenient sentence. Factors such as:
- No prior criminal record
- Demonstrated remorse
- Subjectives of the offender (personal and professional circumstances) Demonstrated remorse
- Efforts at rehabilitation
A guilty plea can sometimes result in reduced penalties, such as a lower prison term or a conditional sentence.
- No
Physical contact is not always necessary. You can be charged with common assault simply for threatening or attempting to cause harm, as long as the victim had a reasonable fear of immediate violence.
- Yes
A conviction for common assault will result in a criminal record, which can affect your employment, travel, and future opportunities.
However, it may be possible to avoid a conviction if the court is persuaded to deal with the matter under Section 10.
Once charges are laid, it is up to the police or prosecution to proceed or withdraw them, not the victim. While a victim’s wishes may be taken into account, the decision to continue lies with the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) or NSW Police.
- Yes
A verbal threat can amount to common assault if it causes the victim to fear immediate and unlawful violence.
The threat must be serious enough and made in a context where the victim genuinely believes harm could occur imminently.
The main difference lies in the extent of injury. Common assault does not require proof of injury, while AOABH involves physical harm that is more than transient or trifling, such as bruises, cuts, or psychological trauma. AOABH carries heavier penalties.
You should not be found guilty if you acted in lawful self-defence. The court will consider whether you believed the force was necessary and whether your response was proportionate. This is a common and valid legal defence.
- No
Injury is not required. Common assault can occur from a threatening gesture, a slap, a shove, or any act that causes another person to fear unlawful force or experience minor physical contact without consent.
Failing to attend court may result in a warrant for your arrest being issued. It is crucial that you appear in court on the specified date or arrange legal representation to act on your behalf if possible. Always contact the court or your lawyer if you’re unsure.
- Yes, but only at the discretion of the police or the prosecution.
If there is insufficient evidence or the alleged victim refuses to cooperate, the prosecution may withdraw the charge upon the negotiation between the lawyer and the police. However, charges can still proceed even without the victim’s support.
- Yes, courts in NSW can issue a non-conviction outcome under Section 10 of the Crimes(Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
This means you are found guilty but no conviction is recorded. This may be more likely if the offence was minor and you have no prior record.
Common Assault involves causing fear orapprehension of immediate violence or minor physical contact withoutsignificant injury. AOABH involves an assault that causes actual physicalinjury beyond minor or transient harm.
“Actual bodily harm” includes injuries that interfere with the health or comfort of the victim and are more than insignificant. Examples include:
- Bruising or swelling
- Lacerations or cuts
- Nosebleeds
- Yes, it isan indictable offence.
However, it is triable summarily in the Local Court under certain conditions (depending on seriousness and election by the prosecution or defence).
- Yes
If a single punch causes injuries such as bruising, lacerations, or a nosebleed, it may be sufficient to support an AOABH charge.
This offence occurs when a person:
- Assaults, resists, hinders, obstructs, or intimidates a police officer,
- While that officer is acting in the execution of their duty.
It is covered under Section 58 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). It includes physical force, verbal threats, or any act that interferes with an officer’s lawful role.
Resisting refers to any physical or active opposition to a lawful police action (e.g., pulling away during arrest). Hindering may involve more passive interference, such as:
- Giving false information
- Blocking police from accessing a location
- Encouraging someone else to resist arrest
- No
The officer does not need to be in uniform, but they must identify themselves clearly as a police officer.
The offence only applies when the officer is lawfully performing their duties (e.g. not off-duty or acting unlawfully).
If you can prove that you reasonably believed your actions were necessary to defend yourself or another, you may have a valid self-defence argument. This defence must be carefully supported by the circumstances and facts.
To be found reckless, the court must find that a reasonable person in your position would have realised there was a substantial risk of causing serious injury. If the risk was not obvious or foreseeable, that may be a defence. A classic example could be, one threw a glass bottle towards another person’s face, which caused a blind eye. A reasonable person would realise the eye could have been injured by do so.
In some cases, legal representatives can negotiate with the prosecution to reduce the charge to assault occasioning actual bodily harm (AOABH) or common assault, depending on the injury, evidence, and intent.
"Wounding" involves breaking both the inner and outer layers of the skin (e.g. a deep cut or puncture), while "GBH" involves more severe or permanent injuries.
Wounding with intent is serious, but GBH with intent usually results in harsher penalties due to the greater level of harm caused.
“To cause GBH or wounding with intent” means the prosecution must prove that the accused deliberately intended to cause serious harm or injury to another person, not just acted recklessly.
It is important to note that intent is a crucial element and must be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
- Yes
If the prosecution can prove there was intent to cause GBH or wounding even if the harm wasn’t permanent or as severe as intended you can still be convicted under Section 33 of the Crimes Act 1900(NSW).
- Yes
These offences are treated seriously by the courts and can result in criminal records, fines, or imprisonment.
A criminal lawyer can advise you on possible defences, negotiate with prosecutors, and represent you in court.
You should contact a criminal lawyer as soon as you are charged, approached by police, or if you believe you may be under investigation.
Early legal advice is critical in protecting your rights and preparing your defence.
Look for a criminal lawyer with proven experience in defending assault and violence offences, strong knowledge of local courts, and a history of achieving successful results for clients.
"Wounding" involves breaking both the inner and outer layers of the skin (e.g. a deep cut or puncture), while "GBH" involves more severe or permanent injuries.
Wounding with intent is serious, but GBH with intent usually results in harsher penalties due to the greater level of harm caused.
“To cause GBH or wounding with intent” means the prosecution must prove that the accused deliberately intended to cause serious harm or injury to another person, not just acted recklessly.
It is important to note that intent is a crucial element and must be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
- Yes
If the prosecution can prove there was intent to cause GBH or wounding even if the harm wasn’t permanent or as severe as intended you can still be convicted under Section 33 of the Crimes Act 1900(NSW).
- Yes
These offences are treated seriously by the courts and can result in criminal records, fines, or imprisonment.
A criminal lawyer can advise you on possible defences, negotiate with prosecutors, and represent you in court.
You should contact a criminal lawyer as soon as you are charged, approached by police, or if you believe you may be under investigation.
Early legal advice is critical in protecting your rights and preparing your defence.
Look for a criminal lawyer with proven experience in defending assault and violence offences, strong knowledge of local courts, and a history of achieving successful results for clients.
SUCCESS CASES & ARTICLES
Brightstone Defence delivers focused criminal defence services year-round and has built a strong track record of successful outcomes.
Meet our lawyers
WORLD CLASS
REPRESENTATION
100+ 5 Star Reviews
Personalised legal strategies tailored to each case
Recognised leaders in criminal defence law
Free initial consultation and case evaluation
Proven success in high-stakes and complex cases
Get instant estimated Quotes
and a free consultation session
Facing criminal charges? Our experienced defence lawyers are here to help. Book your free consultation now to discuss your case and understand your options.
